Multi-framework gap analysis
Analyze the same document against GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, AI Act and PCI-DSS in one pass. Each gap is rated CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW with the specific article or control reference.
Multi-framework gap analysis (GDPR, SOX, HIPAA, SOC 2, DORA, AI Act) without leaking your security posture.
Compliance documents reveal more about your security posture than almost anything else you write — vulnerabilities, data flows, processor chains, control failures. This agent reads them inside an Intel TDX hardware enclave on European infrastructure and returns article-level gap analysis, a quantified risk register and an audit-readiness checklist. Built for teams running 5+ frameworks in parallel.
Built for: DPOs, Chief Compliance Officers, Heads of Risk, CISOs, Internal Audit Directors
External compliance audits cost $50-200K each. Maintaining compliance across GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA and AI Act requires 2-4 FTE. 68% of companies failed at least one audit in the past two years — and sending policies and DPIAs to a US-based model provider exposes the exact playbook an attacker would want.
Run GDPR + SOC 2 + HIPAA gap analysis simultaneously in under 15 minutes, with article-level citations and a quantified risk register.
What the Compliance Officer does on every document, sealed inside an Intel TDX hardware enclave.
Analyze the same document against GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, AI Act and PCI-DSS in one pass. Each gap is rated CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW with the specific article or control reference.
Article-level citations ("GDPR Art. 28(3)(a)", "SOC 2 CC6.1", "HIPAA §164.312") so an auditor can trace every claim back to the source. No vague "complies with GDPR".
Likelihood × impact scoring, plus monetary exposure ("GDPR Art. 83 — up to 4% of global turnover or €20M"; "HIPAA — up to $1.9M per category per year"). Maps to your existing risk framework.
Generates the evidence checklist an auditor would request, marked Available / Partial / Missing — so you know what to collect before the audit kick-off, not during.
Maps personal data flows against legal basis, transfer mechanisms (post-Schrems II), retention and processor agreements. Flags missing DPIA on high-risk processing.
Five bullets for the risk committee: posture rating, top three exposures, financial impact range, recommended budget ask, comparable enforcement actions. No jargon.
Four steps from upload to export. Your document is decrypted only inside the CPU-encrypted enclave.
Privacy policy, DPIA, RoPA, security policy, incident response plan, vendor agreement, internal audit report — drop in PDF or DOCX. Files are decrypted only inside the TDX enclave.
The model runs inside an Intel TDX hardware enclave. Compliance documents — which reveal vulnerabilities and control failures — never leave CPU-encrypted memory.
For each applicable regulation: compliance status, gap list with severity, evidence needed, and a remediation roadmap split into Immediate / Short-term / Medium-term.
Markdown for risk committee decks, structured JSON via API for Vanta / Drata / Tugboat Logic, or PDF for the auditor.
Every output cites the specific article, section or control. The Intel TDX hardware boundary handles the data-protection side; the agent handles the analytical side.
Real prompts from grc / regulatory teams.
Audit this privacy policy against GDPR and CCPA — where are the gaps?
We're a fintech processing EU customer data. Run a DORA + GDPR gap analysis.
Generate a risk register from this security policy. Quantify the exposure.
Our SOC 2 audit is in 60 days. What evidence should we prepare?
Prompt: Review this DPA — does it meet GDPR Art. 28 requirements for a processor?
Output: PARTIAL. Compliant: Art. 28(3)(b) confidentiality, 28(3)(d) sub-processor consent, 28(3)(f) deletion. GAPS: Art. 28(3)(a) — instruction limitation is too permissive ("as reasonably required"); Art. 28(3)(c) security measures reference "industry standard" without specifying which standard; Art. 28(3)(h) audit rights restricted to once per year with 90-day notice — supervisory authorities consider this unenforceable. Recommend redline before signature.
Prompt: We just adopted AI for customer scoring. Do we need a DPIA under the EU AI Act?
Output: Yes — automated decision-making with legal/significant effect on natural persons triggers BOTH GDPR Art. 35 DPIA AND AI Act Annex III high-risk classification (credit/financial scoring). You need: (1) DPIA under GDPR Art. 35; (2) Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment under AI Act Art. 27; (3) Conformity assessment under AI Act Art. 43; (4) Registration in the EU AI database before deployment.
Every tier runs inside Intel TDX hardware enclaves. Plans stay in sync with /pricing.
1,000 requests/month, 1 seat. For solo DPOs, fractional CISOs, independent auditors.
3 seats, 500 requests/month, 100 MB uploads, audit log. For compliance teams at growth-stage companies.
10 seats, 5,000 requests/month, 500 MB uploads, API access for GRC platform integration.
Unlimited seats, fine-tuning on your control library, SSO/SAML, dedicated TDX capacity, signed DPA with EU data residency.
Honest comparison. Hardware-rooted confidentiality is what most alternatives are missing.
| Alternative | Pros | Cons vs VoltageGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Vanta / Drata |
|
|
| OneTrust |
|
|
| ChatGPT Enterprise |
|
|
Inference runs inside Intel TDX hardware enclaves on European infrastructure operated by VOLTAGE EI (France, SIREN 943 808 824). The host CPU encrypts memory in hardware so the cloud operator cannot read prompts or documents during computation. EU jurisdiction means no CLOUD Act exposure.
Vanta and Drata are control-monitoring platforms — they track whether you have evidence, not whether your documents actually comply with the regulation text. The Compliance Officer agent reads the documents and gives you article-level gap analysis. Most customers run both.
Yes. Coverage includes Annex III high-risk classification, Art. 9 risk management, Art. 10 data governance, Art. 14 human oversight, Art. 15 accuracy/robustness, FRIA under Art. 27 and conformity assessment under Art. 43. The agent will tell you which AI Act articles apply to your specific use case.
The output is gap analysis and risk identification — auditors use it to focus their work, not to replace it. Customers typically use it pre-audit to surface issues, then resolve them before the auditor arrives. Output includes article-level citations every auditor will recognize.
VOLTAGE EI is a French operator under GDPR with a signed Art. 28 DPA available on request. SOC 2 Type II is in audit. ISO 27001 is on the roadmap. Intel TDX provides independent hardware-rooted attestation.
Yes, on the Enterprise tier. We tune the system prompt and (optionally) fine-tune the model on your internal control catalog, your DPIA template, your incident response playbook. Fine-tuning runs inside a confidential VM.
Yes, on the Pro tier ($1,199/mo). The API is OpenAI-compatible — change the base URL, keep your SDK. Customers integrate it into Vanta, Drata, OneTrust and Archer to auto-analyze new policy drafts.
External Big Four advisory runs $300-800/hr fully loaded. A single multi-framework readiness assessment can cost $50-200K. Starter handles roughly 50 documents/month for $349; Pro handles 500 documents/month for $1,199. Replaces the bulk of analyst time, not the audit opinion.
Intel TDX attestation, EU jurisdiction, French operator (VOLTAGE EI). Cancel anytime.