CVE triage with exploitability scoring
Combines CVSS, EPSS and CISA KEV catalog to prioritize what matters now. Stops you from patching CVSS 9.8 theoretical issues while ignoring the CVSS 7.5 vuln being actively exploited.
Cybersecurity, Intel TDX sealed
AI Cybersecurity Analyst in a hardened Intel TDX enclave
Triage CVEs, reconstruct incidents and map findings to MITRE ATT&CK, without sending your security posture to a third-party model.
Pentest reports, vulnerability scans, SIEM logs and firewall configs are the most sensitive documents in any organization. A leak of this data is itself a security incident. This agent reads them inside an Intel TDX hardware enclave, under a French controller, prioritizes findings by real-world exploitability, maps everything to MITRE ATT&CK and generates a P0-P3 remediation roadmap. Built for SOC teams and pentest firms that cannot tolerate exposure on shared inference clusters.
Built for: SOC managers, CISOs, MSP/MSSP teams, pentest firms, incident responders
The pain
Average pentest costs $30-150K. SOC analysts spend 70% of their time on triage, not investigation. Mean time to detect a breach is still 204 days. And the documents that drive remediation, pentest reports, scan output, incident artifacts, are the documents an attacker would most want to read.
The outcome
Triage 100s of vulnerability findings by real-world exploitability (CVSS + EPSS + CISA KEV) in minutes, with the analysis sealed inside a CPU-encrypted enclave.
Capabilities
What the Cybersecurity Analyst does on every document, sealed inside an Intel TDX hardware enclave.
MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping
Every finding mapped to a specific ATT&CK technique (e.g., T1566.001, Spearphishing Attachment). Coverage map highlights tactics with no detection, your real blind spots.
Attack-path analysis
Chains individual findings into the highest-risk attack path a real adversary would follow. Quantifies time-to-compromise ("Domain Admin in ~3 steps, 2-4 hours from initial access").
Pentest report validation
Distinguishes validated findings (PoC demonstrated) from theoretical or false-positive findings. Tells you which 47 findings actually need work, and which are noise.
Incident timeline reconstruction
Reads SIEM logs and EDR alerts, rebuilds the timeline with ATT&CK techniques, IOCs and confidence scores. Useful for IR retrospectives and tabletop exercises.
Board-ready risk summary
Translates security findings into FAIR-methodology business risk: annualized loss expectancy, top three exposures, investment to reduce to acceptable level, peer comparison.
How it works, end to end
Four steps from upload to export. Your document is decrypted only inside the CPU-encrypted enclave.
- 01
Upload security artifacts
Pentest report (PDF), Nessus / Qualys scan output, SIEM exports, firewall configs, cloud config snapshots. TLS in transit, decrypted only inside the Intel TDX enclave.
- 02
Hardware-sealed analysis
Vulnerability data is processed in CPU-encrypted memory. The cloud operator cannot access prompts or documents during analysis, neither can a compromised hypervisor.
- 03
Review prioritized findings
Threat summary, finding-by-finding breakdown with ATT&CK mapping, attack-path diagram, P0-P3 roadmap, MITRE coverage map, executive risk summary.
- 04
Export to SIEM / ticketing
Markdown for IR write-ups, JSON via API for Jira / ServiceNow / TheHive, ATT&CK Navigator layers for tabletop sessions.
Frameworks and regulations covered
Every output cites the specific article, section or control. The Intel TDX hardware boundary handles the data-protection side; the agent handles the analytical side.
NIST CSF 2.0MITRE ATT&CKISO 27001 / 27002SOC 2 Type IINIS2 DirectiveCIS Controls v8PCI-DSS v4.0DORA (EU financial)
What people actually ask it
Real prompts from cybersecurity teams.
Triage this vulnerability scan, prioritize by real-world exploitability, not just CVSS.
Map this pentest report to MITRE ATT&CK. What's the most dangerous attack chain?
Analyze these SIEM logs, reconstruct the incident timeline.
This pentest found 47 findings, which ones are false positives?
Sample output
Prompt: Generate a P0-P3 remediation roadmap from this assessment.
Output: P0 (24h): CVE-2024-3094 xz utils backdoor on bastion host, in CISA KEV. CVE-2023-44487 HTTP/2 Rapid Reset on edge proxies, active exploitation. P1 (7d): 12 findings with EPSS >0.5 and no compensating control. P2 (30d): 38 findings with patches available but compensating controls in place. P3 (90d): 84 informational and hardening recommendations.
Prompt: Which 47 pentest findings are false positives?
Output: 14 false positives identified: 6 are network-level SSL ciphersuite findings mitigated by upstream load balancer (CONFIRMED via config review); 4 are theoretical XSS where input is server-side templated only; 2 are CVEs that do not apply to the specific minor version deployed; 2 are CVSS-by-policy findings (info disclosure of build numbers) you have explicitly accepted. Recommend marking these as risk-accepted in the report rather than re-litigating with the pentester.
Pricing
Every tier runs inside Intel TDX hardware enclaves. Plans stay in sync with /pricing.
Plus
$20/mo
1,000 requests/month, 1 seat. For independent pentesters, blue-team consultants.
Starter
$349/mo
3 seats, 2,000 requests/month, 100 MB uploads, audit log. For small SOC teams and MSSPs.
Pro
$1,199/mo
10 seats, 5,000 requests/month, 500 MB uploads, API access for SIEM / SOAR integration, 12-month audit log.
Enterprise
Contact sales
Unlimited seats, fine-tuning on your internal IR playbook, SSO/SAML, dedicated TDX capacity, custom DPA, EU-hosted customer database.
AI Cybersecurity Analyst vs the alternatives
Honest comparison. Hardware-rooted confidentiality is what most alternatives are missing.
| Alternative | Pros | Cons vs VoltageGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Dropzone AI |
|
|
| Charlotte AI (CrowdStrike) |
|
|
| ChatGPT Enterprise |
|
|
FAQ
Is sending vulnerability data to an AI tool really safe?
Only if the architecture prevents the model provider, and the cloud operator, from reading the data. Intel TDX encrypts memory in hardware so neither VoltageGPU nor a compromised hypervisor can access prompts or documents during inference. The controller is French; compute sub-processors are US-based and listed, and the sealed memory is what limits what any of them can hand over.
How does this compare to running a model locally?
Local deployment requires GPU capex, ops headcount, model maintenance and patching. Intel TDX gives you the same isolation guarantee with operating-expense pricing and zero local infrastructure. The hardware boundary is what matters, and it is identical.
Does it replace my SOC analysts?
No. It removes the triage workload that consumes 70% of analyst time, so your team can focus on threat hunting, IR and detection engineering. Output is framed as analysis for trained security professionals, not autonomous response.
Will it correctly identify active threats in our environment?
When SIEM/EDR logs are provided, the agent flags active threats with an explicit "ACTIVE THREAT DETECTED, escalate immediately" banner. It will not redact or downplay findings. It also redacts credentials, API keys and private keys that appear in source documents.
Can I integrate it with Jira, ServiceNow or TheHive?
Yes, on the Pro tier via the OpenAI-compatible API. Customers pipe structured findings into ticket systems and ATT&CK Navigator layers into their detection engineering workflow.
What about MITRE ATT&CK v15 and ATT&CK for Containers?
The agent is current on MITRE ATT&CK v15, including ATT&CK for Containers and Cloud sub-techniques. Coverage maps include the relevant matrix for the artifact type (enterprise, mobile, ICS).
Does it understand cloud-specific findings?
Yes. CIS Benchmarks for AWS, Azure and GCP, CSPM findings (Wiz, Prisma, Orca format), Kubernetes pentest output and IaC scan reports. Cloud config drift gets mapped to specific CIS controls and CSPM rule IDs.
Pricing comparison vs an external SOC?
External SOC-as-a-Service runs $50-200K/year for mid-sized orgs. The agent does not replace 24/7 monitoring, it accelerates the human work inside your team or your MSSP. Most customers pair it with their existing MSSP rather than replacing one.
Keep exploring
Run Cybersecurity Analyst on hardware you can prove
Intel TDX attestation, EU jurisdiction, French operator (VOLTAGE EI). Cancel anytime.