Legalfly Alternative,
Sovereign Legal Agents from France.
European jurisdiction is the easy part. Removing Microsoft Azure from the inference path is the hard one, and it's the one that matters for confidential prompts.
Plans from $20/month.
Positioning
Three differences that change the compliance posture.
European controller, French jurisdiction
VOLTAGE EI is registered in Solaize, France (SIREN 943 808 824). The legal entity, the founders, the bank accounts and the operational team are all inside the EU. There is no US holding company, no offshore reseller, no distant subsidiary that complicates the data-protection chain.
Intel TDX, not Azure
Inference happens on Intel TDX-equipped GPUs. The CPU encrypts the trust domain’s memory with a key it generates at launch, and the host operator sits outside the trust domain, so the trust boundary is hardware, not a data-centre address. VOLTAGE EI is the French counterparty; the GPU host is a listed sub-processor. There is no Microsoft sub-processor in the path of a confidential prompt.
Attestation you can actually obtain
Every Pro and Enterprise session can produce an ECDSA-signed attestation report verifiable against Intel root of trust. This is evidence, not a marketing claim, that the workload that ran is the workload we said would run.
Side-by-side
Legalfly vs VoltageGPU.
Sources: Legalfly publicly disclosed Microsoft Azure relationship via case studies and customer-facing security documentation; VoltageGPU operates its own GPU fleet on Intel TDX hardware.
Pricing
Plus
$20
Solo lawyer · Contract Analyst
Starter
$349
500 analyses / mo
Pro
$1,199
10 seats + API
Enterprise
$3,499
SSO + R1-TEE
FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
Is Belgian jurisdiction not enough for sovereignty?
Belgian jurisdiction is good for the controller relationship. The friction is the inference layer: when the underlying compute runs on Microsoft Azure, the Microsoft entity becomes a sub-processor, with its own commercial terms, its own EU Data Boundary commitments, and its own exposure to US legal process. Some firms accept that chain; others want to remove it entirely. VoltageGPU removes it: VoltageGPU operates the GPUs directly and there is no Microsoft sub-processor in the path of a confidential prompt.
Why does Intel TDX matter when both vendors are RGPD-compliant on paper?
RGPD Article 32 requires "appropriate technical and organizational measures" against unauthorized access. Hardware isolation (a TEE), where the CPU encrypts the trust domain’s memory with a key the host cannot read, is one such technical measure: it keeps the host operator’s software away from the data while it is processed. Physical attacks are outside its threat model, and our relay still sees prompts in transit. For privileged work product, that is a stronger compliance posture than process-based controls alone.
Does VoltageGPU support Dutch and Flemish?
The Contract Review and Due Diligence agents handle EN, FR, DE, ES and IT natively today. Dutch (and by extension Flemish) is on the 2026 roadmap. In the interim, multilingual contracts in our supported languages plus Dutch annexes work well, the agent recognises the Dutch sections and flags them for human review rather than guessing.
Sovereign all the way down.
French controller, model in an Intel TDX enclave, named sub-processors.